Add Row
Add Element
cropper
update
National Cannabis Newswire
update
Add Element
  • Home
  • Categories
    • news
    • trends
    • insights
    • industry
    • legalization
    • health
    • culture
    • advocacy
    • Brands
    • New Mexico Dispensaries
    • Arizona Dispensaries
December 24.2025
3 Minutes Read

Bye-Bye 280E: How Cannabis Rescheduling Will Transform the Industry

Cannabis Law Report logo featuring a historical silhouette.

Historic Shift: Understanding the Executive Order

On December 18, 2025, President Trump signed a groundbreaking executive order titled “Increasing Medical Marijuana and Cannabidiol Research,” aimed at redirecting the federal stance on cannabis. This directive mandates Attorney General Pam Bondi to initiate the complex process of rescheduling marijuana from its current classification as a Schedule I drug to Schedule III under the Controlled Substances Act. Currently, with marijuana deemed a Schedule I substance, it has been categorized alongside drugs like heroin and LSD, which implies a high potential for abuse and no accepted medical use. The implications of this order are profound and set the stage for monumental changes within the cannabis industry.

The Impending End of Section 280E

Among the most significant consequences of rescheduling cannabis is the anticipated elimination of the constraints imposed by Section 280E of the Internal Revenue Code. For years, cannabis businesses have suffered under this provision, which prohibits any deduction for ordinary business expenses when operating within federally classified illegal substances. As a result, cannabis operators have faced higher effective tax rates than companies in other industries. Take an example where both cannabis and traditional businesses generate the same revenue of $1 million but incur $650,000 in cost of goods sold and $250,000 in expenses. Under Section 280E, the cannabis business pays taxes on a gross income of $350,000, leading to heavy financial losses, while the traditional business can deduct its expenses and only pay tax on its net income. Rescheduling to Schedule III would enable cannabis operators to deduct these essential business expenses, leveling the financial playing field.

Broader Financial and Tax Benefits

The rescheduling process is expected to breathe new life into the financial landscape of the cannabis industry. Banks, payment processors, and insurers previously hesitant to engage with cannabis businesses are likely to revisit these opportunities, opening doors to improved access to capital through loans and credit. In a post-rescheduling era, companies will also stand to benefit from expanded insurance options and an overall reduced cost of borrowing. As Karan Wadera of Casa Verde Capital stated, this executive action could mark a significant inflection point for the U.S. cannabis sector, reshaping cash flows, balance sheets, and overall business valuation.

Tax Credits and Research Opportunities

With the removal of the 280E prohibition, cannabis companies will be better positioned to leverage federal tax credits, including those related to research and development (R&D). This adjustment encourages industry participants to invest in domestic R&D, spurring innovation and job creation. As highlighted by industry experts, the ability to deduct ordinary business expenses stands to reduce the accepted tax liability, incentivizing further investment and growth in the cannabis sector. The potential for R&D advancements could play a crucial role in shaping the future of medical marijuana and its therapeutic benefits.

What Lies Ahead: Navigating Changes

Although the executive order marks a pivotal moment, it’s essential to remember that the rescheduling process remains complex and will involve additional steps by the Department of Health and Human Services, the Department of Justice, and the Drug Enforcement Administration. Given the historical challenges in cannabis policy shifts, both operators and investors should adopt a proactive approach in preparing for these upcoming changes. Conducting regular assessments of tax structures, financing options, and operational readiness will be critical for capturing the new opportunities presented by a post-280E environment.

Conclusion: A New Era for Cannabis Businesses

This executive order signals more than just a bureaucratic shift; it heralds the dawn of significant financial reform for cannabis businesses across the nation. As the rescheduling process unfolds, now is the time for operators, investors, and stakeholders to strategize and optimize their positions in anticipation of a transformed landscape where cannabis can thrive under fairer fiscal policies. Keep a close eye on developments and prepare to adapt to the evolving opportunities within the cannabis industry.

health

26 Views

0 Comments

Write A Comment

*
*
Related Posts All Posts

Corporate Interests vs. Grassroots: The Battle for Cannabis Equity

Update The Hidden Costs of Corporate Influence in Cannabis The cannabis industry is experiencing rapid growth in the U.S., but as highlighted by Griffen Basden on the Karma Koala Podcast, this expansion comes with its share of political and regulatory challenges. The intricate dance of legislative capture often favors corporate giants at the expense of grassroots entrepreneurs, threatening the very spirit of the industry. As we navigate this evolving landscape, it’s essential to understand how political interests shape market opportunities. Exploring the Regulatory Landscape Regulatory frameworks governing cannabis have been touted as models of equity and opportunity. New York's Marihuana Regulation and Taxation Act, designed to prioritize equity and justice, has come under scrutiny as corporate influence starts to shape outcomes. Legal experts argue that while laws aim to dismantle barriers for historically marginalized communities, large corporations leverage lobbying power to manipulate these regulations to their advantage. This raises a critical question: Are we witnessing a return to a new form of feudalism where wealth dictates access and opportunity? Dismantling the Stigmas Despite overwhelming evidence supporting cannabis's therapeutic benefits, significant cultural biases persist. The perception that cannabis is merely for recreational use rather than a legitimate medicinal resource stifles progress. The battle for legalization should not only focus on legal frameworks but also on altering public perception. Educating stakeholders about safe practices and the medicinal value of cannabis can help dissolve prejudices, as Kim Anzarut highlights in her discussions of the barriers to acceptance. Empowering Local Entrepreneurs Local entrepreneurs often struggle to access the cannabis market due to bureaucratic hurdles erected by well-funded competitors. As Basden argues, the legislative landscape must underscore long-term support for those who have been most affected by prohibition. By prioritizing pathways for small businesses, particularly those owned by individuals from impacted communities, states can reshape the cannabis market into one that reflects true equity. Innovative Practices to Build Trust Building trust within the broader community is essential for the cannabis industry's reputation. Implementing Good Manufacturing Practices (cGMP) and other safety standards can not only ensure product safety but also appeal to “the squares” — policymakers and healthcare professionals critical for broader acceptance. When businesses demonstrate commitment to safety and quality, they not only protect their consumers but also enhance their legitimacy in an industry still plagued by skepticism. Future Predictions: A Call for Accountability The future of the cannabis industry depends on our ability to hold corporate interests accountable. Grassroots movements and the upfront policies supporting small businesses must gain momentum. As the industry matures, consumers and advocates must demand transparency and equity in all regulatory matters. This proactive approach will empower a new generation of entrepreneurs and safeguard the interests of communities devastated by the war on drugs.

The Tragic Murder in California's Cannabis Industry: A Complex Narrative

Update The Dark Side of California's Cannabis Industry In October 2019, the tranquil beauty of Santa Cruz was shattered when tech executive Tushar Atre was found murdered, execution-style, on his property. A promising figure in California's burgeoning cannabis sector, Atre’s life was cut short amid a backdrop of ambition, innovation, and crime. His tragic story highlights the murky waters that exist between the legal and illegal aspects of cannabis trade in the United States. According to investigative journalist Scott Eden, who chronicles Atre's tale in his book A Killing in Cannabis, the tension within this industry has profound implications for entrepreneurs trying to navigate a landscape that has often favored criminal elements over lawful business operations. Eden asserts, "The black market exists only because we decided that this form of trade should be illegal," highlighting a fundamental issue: the flawed legal framework surrounding cannabis in America. The Consequences of Ambiguity in Legislation The cannabis industry in California, despite being one of the first to legalize recreational use, has faced significant challenges. Eden discusses how most cannabis founders have struggled economically, which continues to foster a black market that some have turned to out of sheer necessity. The ongoing struggle between legality and illicit practices creates a breeding ground for violence and exploitation. For example, many entrepreneurs like Atre sought to participate in the industry to challenge stereotypes and innovate. However, many others—driven by profit—allow themselves to become entangled with dubious figures and practices. Eden's narrative serves as a cautionary tale, illustrating how ambition can lead one down dangerous paths. A Cautionary Tale for Future Innovators The death of Tushar Atre is a stark reminder of the potential perils lurking within the cannabis industry, particularly for those unprepared to face its darker sides. His story resonates with many who are drawn to California for the promise of opportunity only to find themselves unprepared for the risks that accompany those dreams. As the U.S. navigates the challenges of cannabis legalization, stories like Atre’s question whether the current approach sufficiently safeguards budding entrepreneurs and whether new regulations to address these issues truly reflect the reality of the market. This narrative underscores an urgent need for thoughtful legislation and robust support systems for those navigating this complicated landscape. Join the Discussion The complexities surrounding cannabis law are only beginning to unfold, and discussions about how to create a safer, more equitable industry are essential. Scott Eden’s insights into Tushar Atre’s life and demise offer a lens through which to view the immense challenges ahead, reminding us of the importance of fair practices, open dialogue, and responsible legislation. To explore more about how California’s cannabis journey intersects with opportunity, risk, and the shadows of the black market, listen to Scott Eden’s podcast episode and engage with the wider conversation.

Marijuana Businesses Beware: Internal Revenue Code Section 280E Challenges

Update The Growing Marijuana Industry and Its Federal Tax Challenges As the marijuana industry continues to expand across the United States, traditional expectations of business operations encounter glaring discrepancies. With an estimated $23.9 billion for adult-use marijuana and $7.6 billion for medical cannabis sales reported in 2025, the market is projected to top $39.1 billion by 2029. This significant growth has been propelled by numerous states that have eased restrictions surrounding both medical and recreational marijuana use. However, despite this positive trajectory, marijuana businesses are still grappling with burdensome tax laws that stem from federal regulations. Understanding Internal Revenue Code Section 280E At the center of this issue lies Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 280E, which is particularly punitive for marijuana businesses. Under this provision, businesses engaged in trafficking controlled substances cannot take notable deductions or credits. This reflects the federal government’s enduring classification of marijuana as a Schedule I controlled substance under the Controlled Substances Act (CSA). It's a complex and often frustrating scenario for entrepreneurs who are navigating a legal marijuana marketplace on the state level while being shackled by federal classification. Implications of 280E on Marijuana Businesses The prohibition on deductions means that, unlike most businesses, marijuana companies must report their gross income without offsetting expenses. They cannot deduct costs that many other industries take for granted, leading to significantly higher tax liabilities. While businesses can deduct the cost of goods sold (COGS), the limitations imposed by 280E mean that effective tax rates for marijuana businesses can soar as high as 70% or more in some cases. This financial burden can hinder expansion and operational effectiveness, raising the costs of consumer products despite strong demand. Current Legislative Climate: A Potential Shift? Interestingly, discussions on reform are emerging with numerous legislative proposals aimed at altering the restrictive measures of Section 280E. These proposals primarily focus on rescheduling or descheduling marijuana and could provide tailored exceptions for marijuana businesses. There is also a growing public sentiment advocating for reform, with many citizens and politicians recognizing the imbalance in how marijuana businesses are taxed compared to other industries. Constitutional Dilemmas and Challenges Unfortunately, historical challenges against the application of Section 280E have been largely unsuccessful. Efforts to legally dispute the constitutionality of Section 280E underscore broader issues regarding the powers of Congress and states, especially when it comes to the evolving consensus around marijuana use. As advocates push for reform, the reliance on constitutional arguments raises critical questions about the future of marijuana taxation and legalization. What Lies Ahead for Cannabis Businesses? The tension between federal law and state regulations surrounding marijuana use and business operations is likely to create ongoing challenges for the industry. However, if moved forward, proposed changes to federal policies will pave the way for marijuana businesses to thrive without the crippling tax constraints imposed by Section 280E. It remains to be seen how the legal landscape will evolve as advocates remain diligent in their quest for more equitable tax treatment.

Terms of Service

Privacy Policy

Core Modal Title

Sorry, no results found

You Might Find These Articles Interesting

T
Please Check Your Email
We Will Be Following Up Shortly
*
*
*