Add Row
Add Element
cropper
update
National Cannabis Newswire
update
Add Element
  • Home
  • Categories
    • news
    • trends
    • insights
    • industry
    • legalization
    • health
    • culture
    • advocacy
    • Brands
    • New Mexico Dispensaries
    • Arizona Dispensaries
January 13.2026
2 Minutes Read

ASTM D37 on Cannabis Elects New Leadership: What This Means for Industry Standards

Professional in the cannabis industry leadership.

New Leadership Takes Helm of ASTM D37 on Cannabis

In a significant development for the cannabis industry, the ASTM International’s Committee D37 has elected new leadership for the 2026–2027 term. David Vaillencourt, co-founder of the S3 Collective and a passionate advocate for standards in the cannabis sector, has become chair of the committee. He is joined by Darwin Millard, the technical director of Cannabis Safety & Quality (CSQ), who will serve as the vice chair.

What is ASTM D37 and Why It Matters

The Committee D37 on Cannabis was established in 2017, bringing together industry leaders to craft standards focused on quality and safety in the growing cannabis and hemp sector. As the global community surrounding cannabis expands, having rigorous and widely recognized standards becomes crucial. With over 1,200 members globally, the committee has already developed more than 40 standards that enhance the compliance, safety, and overall quality of cannabis products. Vaillencourt's leadership is expected to further these efforts, ensuring that the established standards are practical and widely adopted by both regulators and industry practitioners.

A Focus on Inclusivity and Relevance

One of the primary goals articulated by Vaillencourt and Millard is to enhance member participation and to involve a broader diversity of experts in crafting the standards. This inclusivity is vital for creating standards that hold value across different sectors of the industry, from cultivation to consumer use. By prioritizing diverse voices, the committee aims to strengthen trust between market participants, facilitating clearer expectations regarding product safety and efficacy.

Engagement Is Key: Call to Action for Stakeholders

S3 Collective encourages a wide array of stakeholders, including cannabis operators, regulators, public health experts, medical practitioners, and patient advocates, to join the ASTM D37's consensus process. The outcome of this shared effort is anticipated to protect not only consumers but also workers within the cannabis ecosystem. As participation grows, so too does the potential for meaningful industry advancements.

Implications for Industry Standards

The leadership transition comes at a crucial moment when various states and countries are re-evaluating their cannabis regulations. Establishing clear, vetted standards will not only help to assure product quality but also provide a framework through which regulators can effectively monitor compliance. This commitment to standardization not only enhances public health outcomes but also serves as a catalyst for economic growth within the industry.

The recent leadership elections underscore an ongoing evolution within the cannabis sector—where standardization is not just an afterthought but a fundamental pillar of trust and safety in this burgeoning marketplace.

By participating in ASTM D37, members have the chance to influence the future landscape of cannabis regulations and standards, ultimately contributing to a safer and more transparent market.

health

2 Views

0 Comments

Write A Comment

*
*
Related Posts All Posts

The Role of AI in Journalism: Unpacking Libertarian Views on Cannabis Reform

Update Are AI-Driven Articles Compromising Integrity in Journalism?The recent publication of an article on cannabis reform and libertarians by High Times has raised eyebrows—primarily due to its questionable authenticity and lack of editorial review.Critics have pointed out that the article appears to mimic the style of artificial intelligence-generated text. It fails to sufficiently define key terms or engage meaningfully with the evolution of libertarian views on cannabis, particularly over the last decade. In an age where trust in media is paramount, what does this mean for our understanding of significant social issues?The Intersection of Libertarianism and Cannabis ReformHistorically, libertarians have championed the deregulation of cannabis in the United States, advocating for personal freedoms and minimal governmental interference. However, as highlighted in Libertarianism.org, the principles that underpin libertarian policies reflect a deeper philosophy about technology and individual rights, extending beyond just marijuana legalization.The libertarian approach promotes innovation while emphasizing the importance of personal choice and autonomy in social contexts. As cannabis reform begins to intersect with these principles, it is crucial to articulate the nuances of this relationship clearly, something that the controversial High Times article oddly neglected.Emerging Trends Amidst ControversyThe cannabis landscape is evolving rapidly, driven not only by changing social attitudes but also by transformative technological and regulatory frameworks. As seen in the Canna Law Blog, legal challenges and a push for industry standards are reshaping how cannabis businesses operate.The High Times article addresses these shifts only superficially, missing an opportunity to provide a rich analysis of current trends in civil marijuana litigation, public perception shifts, and the implications of technological advancements like AI within the industry.Fostering Authentic Dialogue Through AIThe rise of AI in content generation is sparking discussions about journalistic authenticity and accountability. The Canna Law Blog notes the complicated relationship between technology and cannabis, suggesting that as industries become intertwined, the narrative surrounding them should remain nuanced and well-informed.A Call for Responsibility in ReportingAs media sources grapple with the consequences of AI-generated content, there lies a vital responsibility to ensure that the integrity of journalism is upheld. In publishing articles that lack editorial scrutiny, platforms like High Times must evaluate how their choices reflect on their credibility and the discourse surrounding critical issues like cannabis reform.

Ukraine's Historic Approval of Medical Cannabis Quotas: A Crucial Step Forward

Update A Historic Shift in Ukraine's Medical Cannabis PolicyOn January 5, 2026, Ukraine took a significant leap forward in its medical cannabis policy by officially approving quotas for the first time. This bold move, endorsed by the Cabinet of Ministers, aims to facilitate the production, manufacturing, storage, import, and export of controlled substances for medical purposes. The resolution is not only a regulatory step but a response to the pressing medical needs arising from ongoing conflicts, with an increasing number of patients requiring effective pain management therapies, particularly among injured soldiers.The Calculation Behind the QuotasIn determining the quotas, various factors were meticulously analyzed, including applications from licensed businesses and their production capacities. This approach aims to ensure that production meets the specific needs of users—ranging from patients to pharmaceutical manufacturers—while simultaneously safeguarding against the illegal circulation of narcotic drugs. The approval also aligns with Ukraine's international obligations under the 1961, 1971, and 1988 UN Conventions, ensuring a rigid framework for controlled substances in the country.Integration of Medical Cannabis into HealthcareThis resolution marks a remarkable milestone for Ukraine’s healthcare system. Six medical cannabis-based substances are currently registered in Ukraine, with another 18 under review. This integrated approach ensures that every aspect of cannabis distribution—from cultivation to sale—will be meticulously tracked through a digital control system, enhancing transparency and accountability.A Changing Landscape of Medical NeedsThe need for cannabis-based medicine has escalated dramatically in the aftermath of war. As civilian and military patients grapple with chronic pain and trauma-related ailments, the state of Ukraine is responding by expanding access to innovative forms of treatment. Falk Altenhoefer, a prominent advocate for medical cannabis, highlighted the transformative nature of this legislation, stating that the approval of these quotas would once have seemed unthinkable.The Future of Medical Cannabis in UkraineThis progressive reform aligns with a larger global trend toward the legalization of cannabis for medical purposes. Countries across the globe are recognizing the effectiveness of cannabis in treating various medical conditions. For Ukraine, this reform not only paves the way for improved patient care but could also stimulate economic opportunities in the burgeoning cannabis industry.Embracing a Pragmatic Approach to HealthcareUkraine’s decision to adapt its medical policy reflects a pragmatic response to changing needs and circumstances. It signifies a commitment to providing modern medical solutions that prioritize human-centered care. For nations still cautious about cannabis legalization, Ukraine's journey serves as a compelling case study on how smart policy can facilitate patient access to essential medications.Your Role in the DialogueAs global conversations about cannabis continue to evolve, it’s vital for citizens and advocates to stay informed and engaged. Understanding the implications of medical cannabis legislation in Ukraine can inspire similar discussions in other countries where access to medical treatments remains limited. Consider supporting local advocacy groups and participating in community dialogues to promote informed discussions on this crucial topic.

Ghana’s Proposed Hemp Fees: $45,000 Per Hectare Raising Concerns

Update Ghana's Ambitious Hemp Licensing Fees: A Barrier to Growth? The government of Ghana is proposing a new licensing regime for hemp cultivation that has stirred significant controversy within its agricultural community. The proposed fees, starting at $9,000 for 0.4 hectares and potentially increasing to $45,000 per hectare, are being labeled as the highest in the world. Many local activists and potential growers argue that such fees are prohibitively high and could effectively block local farmers and entrepreneurs from entering the industry. The Local Response: Activists Demand Reconsideration The Ghanaian hemp activist group, Hempire Agric Ghana (HAG), has vocally opposed the government’s high fees. They find the proposed rates to be unrealistic and detrimental to the burgeoning hemp industry, which has faced numerous delays as lawmakers deliberate over cannabis regulations. HAG is actively seeking a meeting with Deputy Speaker of Parliament, Bernard Ahiafor, to discuss these concerns and work towards a more feasible framework for the hemp sector. Importance of Hemp Regulations: Balancing Growth and Accessibility Hemp has been hailed for its economic potential, offering benefits ranging from agricultural versatility to sustainable materials and health products. However, the costs associated with entering the market can deter local investments, potentially limiting the industry to larger, wealthier players while sidelining small-scale farmers who often drive local economies. The current licensing fees could thus lead to an inequitable playing field, leaving many capable growers out of the industry. Broader Implications for Ghana's Economy As the conversation around cannabis legalization grows globally, Ghana stands at a crossroads. A balanced approach to hemp regulation that encourages investment while remaining accessible to local producers could position Ghana as a leader in this emerging market. As various nations look toward hemp for economic boosts, how Ghana decides to proceed could set a precedent for agricultural policy across Africa. Looking Ahead: What’s Next for Hemp in Ghana? With pressures mounting from both activists and potential investors, the future of hemp cultivation in Ghana remains uncertain. The upcoming discussions between HAG and Parliament could shape how the sector develops, creating pathways for growth or further entrenching barriers. As this situation evolves, it will be crucial for Ghana to navigate the complexities of licensing and regulation to support sustainable agricultural practices and economic development. Conclusion: The Call for Fairer Regulations The current proposed licensing fees stand as not just a financial hurdle but as a significant indicator of how the Ghanaian government values local involvement in an industry that could offer both jobs and growth. By reevaluating the fee structure, Ghana could harness the benefits of hemp while fostering an inclusive economic environment that encourages local participation.

Terms of Service

Privacy Policy

Core Modal Title

Sorry, no results found

You Might Find These Articles Interesting

T
Please Check Your Email
We Will Be Following Up Shortly
*
*
*